JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 21, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Gustavo Tellez Riaño

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaracion Y Adicion De La C-647/00.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia de aclaración o adición
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente el escrito presentado por el ciudadano de la referencia, mediante el cual solicitó la aclaración y adición de la Sentencia C-647/00, toda vez que el solicitante pretende que la Corte se pronuncie extemporáneamente sobre la interpretación de su propio fallo, cuando la Corte efectuó un análisis de constitucionalidad, a propósito de las objeciones presidenciales frente a un cargo general y en relación con el último inciso del Art. 2º y el Art. 6º del Proyecto de Ley No. 148 de 1998 Senado y 221 de 1999 Cámara, "Por medio del cual se reglamenta el ejercicio de la actividad notarial".

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. RECHAZASE por improcedente el escrito presentado por el ciudadano Gustavo Téllez Riaño, mediante el cual solicitó la aclaración y adición de la Sentencia C-647 del 2000
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.